Ex Parte GOSHEY et al - Page 11

          Appeal No. 2004-0933                                                        
          Application 09/256,680                                                      
          performing the steps of claim 1.  Therefore, the rejection of               
          claim 15 and its dependent claims 16-21 must also be reversed.              
          In summary, the rejection of claims 1-21 is reversed.                       
                                      REVERSED                                        



                         LEE E. BARRETT                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )  BOARD OF PATENT             
                         JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO            )     APPEALS                  
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )       AND                    
                                                       )   INTERFERENCES              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         ROBERT NAPPI                  )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              











                                       - 11 -11                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007