The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN EDWARD PETROVIC
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0946
Application No. 09/965,150
____________
HEARD: June 10, 2004
____________
Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to
allow claims 10 through 14 as amended subsequent to the final
rejection in a paper filed May 1, 2003 (Paper No. 8). Claims 10
through 14 are the only claims remaining in the application.
Claims 1 through 9 and 15 through 18 have been canceled.1 In
1 Although we note that the examiner has approved entry of
the above-noted amendment filed May 1, 2003 (see advisory action,
Paper No. 9), we observe that such amendment has not as of yet
been clerically entered. This oversight should be corrected
during any further prosecution of the application before the
examiner.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007