Ex Parte Petrovic - Page 2



                    Appeal No. 2004-0946                                                                                                                                  
                    Application No. 09/965,150                                                                                                                            

                    addition, at the oral hearing held June 10, 2004, appellant's                                                                                         
                    counsel requested that claim 14 be withdrawn from the appeal.                                                                                         
                    Accordingly, the appeal as to claim 14 is dismissed, and only the                                                                                     
                    examiner's rejection of claims 10 through 13 remains for                                                                                              
                    consideration in this appeal.                                                                                                                         

                    Appellant's invention is directed to a multiple head shower                                                                                           
                    system for retrofit installation on an existing shower plumbing                                                                                       
                    system in a shower enclosure.  Independent claim 10 is                                                                                                
                    representative of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of that                                                                                     
                    claim can be found in the Appendix to appellant's brief.                                                                                              

                    The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                                                 
                    examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                                        
                    Gellmann                                         3,375,532                                         Apr.  2, 1968                                      
                    Holbrook                                         6,233,756                                         May  22, 2001                                      
                    Claims 10 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                                                                                          
                    as being unpatentable over Gellmann in view of Holbrook.                                                                                              

                    Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner's full                                                                                                  
                    commentary with regard to the above-noted § 103 rejection and the                                                                                     
                    conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellant                                                                                         
                                                                                    22                                                                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007