Appeal No. 2004-0996
Application No. 09/520,947
discussion above regarding the function of the inner wrap and
outer bag as taught by Morris.1
For the foregoing reasons and those stated in the Brief and
Reply Brief, we determine that the examiner has not established a
prima facie case of obviousness in view of the reference evidence.
Accordingly, we do not sustain any of the rejections on appeal.
1The examiner has applied Collins and Blum to establish the
obviousness of limitations recited in several dependent claims
(Paper No. 8, page 5). Accordingly, we determine that Collins
and Blum do not remedy the deficiencies in the examiner’s
rejections as noted above.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007