Appeal No. 2004-1020 Application No. 09/486,908 inaccurate, as the background section of the reference clearly indicates otherwise. As explained in column 7, lines 15-30, of Pawlowski, while the first cache line of data is being retrieved, the I/O controller may cause the prefetch of consecutive cache lines of data. Thus, while the main memory is retrieving the first cache line of data, the combination of the main memory and the I/O module results in the access of a “data storage device” in amounts other than the entire cache line. Moreover, we agree with the examiner’s reasoned analysis, at pages 7-8 of the answer, wherein the examiner explained that the amount of data that can be stored between two neighboring starting addresses, e.g., starting addresses A & B, would be a single cache line. A request resulting in the output of both the initial cache line (cache line 1) and a prefetch line (cache line 2) would therefore output two cache lines. Thus, the amount of data that can be stored between two neighboring start addresses, viz., one cache line, would be smaller than the amount of data output in response to the request, viz., two cache lines. Appellant’s response is merely to argue that the examiner’s interpretation of the combination of the I/O module and the main memory comprising a “data storage device” is “inconsistent with -7–Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007