The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHRISTIAN OLIVER PASCHEREIT,
WOLFGANG WEISENSTEIN,
EPHRAIM GUTMARK and WOLFGANG POLIFKE
____________
Appeal No. 2004-1023
Application No. 09/393,714
____________
HEARD: July 13, 2004
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 18 and
20-26. Claims 3, 5-10, 15-17 and 19 have been withdrawn as being directed to a non-
elected invention and the remaining claims have been canceled.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007