Ex Parte Turner et al - Page 16


              Appeal No. 2004-1040                                                        Page 16                        
              Application No. 09/770,643                                                                                 

                     Appellants also argue that the claimed polynucleotides are useful because of the                    
              disclosed polymorphism at position 812 of SEQ ID NO:1:  “As polymorphisms such as                          
              this are the basis for forensic analysis, which is undoubtedly a ‘real world’ utility, the                 
              presently claimed sequences must in themselves be useful.”  Appeal Brief, page 11.                         
              “The fact that forensic biologists use polymorphic markers such as that described by                       
              Appellants every day provides more tha[n] ample support for the assertion that forensic                    
              biologists would also be able to use the specific polymorphic marker described by                          
              Appellants in the same fashion.”  Id., page 13.  The lack of information regarding                         
              biological function is irrelevant to this utility, Appellants argues, because “[f]orensic                  
              analysis requires no information regarding the function of the protein encoded by the                      
              polymorphic DNA sequence.”  Id., pages12-13.                                                               
                     This argument is not persuasive because, among other things, it has no support                      
              in the specification or in the evidence of record.  The specification discloses the                        
              presence of a polymorphism in SEQ ID NO:1 (page 14) but discloses no utilities based                       
              on detection of the polymorphism.  In particular, the specification does not disclose that                 
              the polymorphism is a useful marker for forensic analysis.                                                 
                     Appellants cite the specification at page 10, lines 15-19, as disclosing that “the                  
              present nucleic acids sequences have utility in forensic analysis.”  Appeal Brief, page                    
              11.  We do not agree that this passage supports Appellants’ argument.  The sentence                        
              cited by Appellants reads as follows:                                                                      
                     The identification and characterization of human genomic clones is helpful                          
                     for identifying polymorphisms (including, but not limited to, nucleotide                            
                     repeats, microsatellite alleles, single nucleotide polymorphisms, or coding                         
                     single nucleotide polymorphisms), determining the genomic structure of a                            
                     given locus/allele, and designing diagnostic tests.                                                 





Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007