Appeal No. 2004-1040 Page 22 Application No. 09/770,643 We note that this application is one of several on appeal that share the same assignee.6 In each of these cases, regardless of the specific facts of the case, the Appellants have asserted the same DNA chip, gene-mapping, and exon splice junction arguments. Apparently, Appellants view these potential uses as utilities that can be asserted for any cDNA they isolate, regardless of how little is known about it, which (they hope) will nonetheless serve as a basis for patent protection and secure for Appellants any value that might become apparent in the future, after they or others have further characterized the claimed products. This is precisely the type of result that the Brenner Court sought to avoid by requiring disclosure of a substantial utility to satisfy § 101. See 148 U.S. at 535-36, 148 USPQ at 696: [The Court was not] “blind to the prospect that what now seems without ‘use’ may tomorrow command the grateful attention of the public. But a patent is not a hunting license. It is not a reward for the search, but compensation for its successful conclusion.” Id. The polynucleotides of the instant claims may indeed prove to be useful (and valuable), after the in vivo role of the encoded protein is discovered. The work required to confer value on the claimed products, however, remains to be done. The instant specification’s disclosure does not justify a grant of patent rights. See Brenner, 383 U.S. at 534, 148 USPQ at 695: “[A] process patent in the chemical field, which has not been developed and pointed to the degree of specific utility, creates a monopoly of knowledge which should be granted only if clearly commanded by the statute. Until the process claim has been reduced to production of a product shown to be useful, the 6 Such applications include 09/460,594 (Appeal No. 2003-1528), 09/804,969 (2003-1794); 09/802,116 (2003-2017); 09/822,807 (2003-2028); and 09/564,557 (2004-0343).Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007