Appeal No. 2004-1043 Application No. 09/960,907 using an airsweep and a controller to control the airsweep in view of the secondary references. B. The Weaver Reference i. The instant invention is patentable over the combination of the Beck paper and the Weaver reference due to differences in structure (XII. B, pages 2U-23) Appellant has argued several structural differences between the cell used in the, Beck paper and the cell taught by Weaver, including differences in electrode structure and heating structure. Beck teaches a method for the electrolytic production of aluminum from alumina. Beck teaches the structure of the electrolytic cell, including the orientation and structure of the anodes and cathodes, as well as the use of an anodic liner (figs. 9-11). Like Beck, Weaver also teaches the electrolytic production of aluminum from alumina using anodes and cathodes. Regarding claims 1-17, the Weaver reference also teaches a method of advantageously using off-peak power by intermittently operating the electrolytic cell and applying heat to prevent the freezing of the bath when the power is not supplied (see US ‘340, p. 3, col. 2, lines 61-74). Therefore, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to operate the, electrolytic cell of Beck intermittently to take advantage of off-peak power as taught by Weaver. One skilled in the art would have heated the electrolyte to maintain the electrolyte in molten state as taught by Weaver to "prevent the freezing of the bath to a hard stone-like substance which would cause damage to the 20Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007