Ex Parte Bui et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2004-1114                                                                  Page 2                
              Application No. 10/079,706                                                                                  


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The appellants' invention relates to French door dummy handles, knob, and                            
              levers and supporting hardware thereof.  The invention provides a stop plate                                
              incorporating self-aligning and self-tightening features that works with existing knobs                     
              and levers to eliminate wobble (specification, p. 1).  A copy of claims 2 to 6 is set forth                 
              in the appendix to the appellants' brief.  Claim 1 reads as follows:                                        
                            A stop plate for use with a dummy lockset comprising:                                         
                            means for aligning an operating handle of the lockset; and                                    
                            means for eliminating rotational movement of the operating handle about                       
                     a longitudinal axis of the lockset.                                                                  


                     The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                       
              appealed claims is:                                                                                         
              Hart                                3,985,008                           Oct. 12, 1976                       


                     Claims 1 to 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as                              
              containing subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as                     
              to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly                      
              connected, to make and/or use the invention.1                                                               



                     1 In addition, the examiner objected to the drawings under 37 CFR § 1.83(a) for not showing every    
              feature set forth in claim 1.                                                                               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007