Appeal No. 2004-1114 Page 4 Application No. 10/079,706 The enablement rejection We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1 to 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. Figure 1 of the appellants' application is an exploded view of an exterior dummy leverset chassis 10 for a dummy lockset. The chassis includes a rose liner 12, an exterior sleeve 14 and a retainer 16. The exterior sleeve 14 extends through an aperture 18 in the rose liner 12 and is held in place by the retainer 16. A stop plate 20 with a self-tightening mechanism engages the exterior sleeve 14 and abuts the inner surface of the rose liner 12. As shown in Figure 2, the stop plate 20 includes a generally circular portion 32 having a central aperture 34 and four arms 36 extending outwardly from the center portion 32. A pair of rectangular fingers 40 extend radially inwardly into the central aperture 34 and are configured to engage slots 28 formed in the exterior sleeve 14. A pair of opposed notches 42 are formed in the circular portion 32 and are configured to engage bosses 22 formed on the rose liner 12. The appellants teach (specification, pp. 1-2) that: The means for aligning includes a sleeve having a slot coupled to the operating handle, and a finger configured to engage the slot. The means for eliminatingPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007