Ex Parte COSTA - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-1174                                                        
          Application No. 09/470,793                                                  


               In the rejection of the appealed claims, the examiner relies           
          upon the following references:                                              
          Pierce et al. (Pierce)         4,490,147            Dec. 25, 1984           
          Abuto et al. (Abuto)           5,964,743            Oct. 12, 1999           
               Appellant's claimed invention is directed to a disposable              
          sanitary napkin comprising an absorbing core intermediate top and           
          coating layers.  The absorbing core comprises three or more                 
          longitudinally extending absorbing panels that are substantially            
          independent from each other, being separated by channels.  The              
          top layer is sealed to the coating layer in the channels between            
          the absorbing panels.  According to appellant,                              
               [A] sanitary napkin having an odd number of panels, in                 
               this case either 3 or 5 absorbing panels allows a                      
               center panel to maintain good fit to a wearer's body in                
               use, while allowing the adjacent panels to pivot and                   
               conform to the space between the wearer's legs in use"                 
               [page 2 of Brief, last sentence].                                      
               Appealed claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as           
          being anticipated by Abuto.  Claims 2, 5-11 and 14-17 stand                 
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                
          Abuto in view of Pierce.                                                    
               Appellant submits at page 3 of the Brief that the appealed             
          claims, as separately rejected, stand or fall together.  With               
          respect to the § 103 rejection, appellant simply states at page 6           
          of the Brief that appellant respectfully disagrees with this                


                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007