Ex Parte COSTA - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2004-1174                                                        
          Application No. 09/470,793                                                  


          the absorbing panels.  Appellant also does not dispute that Abuto           
          discloses and claims that the absorbent material is incorporated            
          into personal care products, such as feminine hygiene products              
          (see columns 8 and 9).  It is appellant's contention that whereas           
          appellant claims a disposable sanitary napkin, a specific article           
          of manufacture, "the absorbent material disclosed in Abuto is not           
          an absorbent article, it may be used to form an absorbent                   
          article" (page 4 of Brief, second paragraph).  Appellant                    
          maintains that "the Figures 1-4 in Abuto are not products, but in           
          fact are components that may be incorporated into a final                   
          absorbent article" (id.).                                                   
               We are not persuaded by appellant's argument because we                
          concur with the examiner that Abuto fairly describes a disposable           
          sanitary napkin within the meaning of § 102.  We are satisfied              
          that claims 8 and 9 of Abuto, which define a feminine hygiene               
          product as an article of manufacture, would be interpreted by one           
          of ordinary skill in the art as describing a disposable sanitary            
          napkin having the claimed structure.  In our view, when the                 
          reference is considered as a whole, it is not necessary for a               
          finding of description under § 102 that Abuto does not use the              
          terminology recited by appellant, i.e., disposable sanitary                 
          napkin.  As for appellant's argument that "there is no                      


                                         -4-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007