Appeal No. 2004-1175 Page 5 Application No. 09/850,307 flat tire mounted on a wheel, the combined teachings of Graber and Caddick would not have led one of ordinary skill in the art to combine their relevant teachings to arrive at the invention as set forth in claim 1. Since the subject matter of claim 1 is not suggested by the applied prior art as set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 1, and claims 2 to 20 dependent thereon, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007