Ex Parte HAILPERN et al - Page 5




            Appeal No. 2004-1176                                                         Page 5              
            Application No. 09/232,751                                                                       




            In some cases, special price-reduction is granted to selected customer categories, such          
            as students, senior citizens, frequent shoppers, military personnel, etc., which may be          
            indicated to the data processor system by a portable unit carried by the purchaser,              
            which unit interacts with the electronic shelf label to display the special price for the        
            category of purchaser (column 2, lines 1-7).  The discounted prices offered to certain           
            categories of purchasers are included in the basic price information 112 stored in the           
            computer system and may also be further reduced according to the price-reduction                 
            criteria 116 of the system, which includes, among other things, sales volume and                 
            current inventory status, as discussed above.                                                    
                   Based on our review of Teicher, we conclude that, at best, Teicher would have             
            suggested use of operating environment conditions, such as sales volume and current              
            inventory, by servers in Williams’ system in determining which promotions to offer, that         
            is, the selection of products or services on which to offer coupons and the offering price       
            on said selected products.  We find no suggestion in Teicher or Tso, however, to modify          
            Williams so as to select one or more target groups dependent on changes in operating             
            environment, as called for in claim 1.  It follows that we cannot sustain the examiner’s         
            rejection of claim 1, or claims 2-4, 7-12, 14 and 15 depending therefrom, as being               
            unpatentable over Williams in view of Tso and Teicher.                                           









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007