The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding
precedent of the Board
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MARK L. BINETTE, MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN,
THOMAS J. KENNEDY, III, MICHAEL J. TZIVANIS,
VIKTOR KELLER and WILLIAM M. RISEN, JR.
______________
Appeal No. 2004-1225
Application 09/840,312
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-39.
On pages 3-4 of the brief, appellants group the claims as
set forth therein. In view of the groupings set forth by
appellants, we consider claims 1, 14 and 27 in this appeal. We
also consider any claim separately argued by appellants, e.g.,
claim 4, in regard to PGA compression values of the core. See
37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7) and (8)(2003). Claims 1, 14, and 27 are
appended to this opinion.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007