Ex Parte Binette et al - Page 3




          Appeal No.  2004-1225                                                       
          Application No.  09/840,312                                                 

          page 5.  Appellants argue that Wu does not teach that each layer            
          has a Shore D hardness of less than 60.  Brief, page 6.                     
               Beginning on page 5 of the answer, the examiner finds that             
          Wu discloses that the intermediate layer and/or cover layers of             
          the golf ball of Wu is formed of a polyurethane composition.  The           
          examiner refers to column 6, lines 54-58.  Appellants do not                
          dispute that Wu discloses that the intermediate and cover layers            
          are formed of a polyurethane composition.  Brief, page 5.  In               
          fact, as pointed out by the examiner, Wu discloses example cover            
          layers as having Shore D hardness values of 52, 54, and 55 (Table           
          2 of Wu).  Answer, pages 3-4.                                               
               We note that it is well settled that the Patent and                    
          Trademark Office can require appellants to prove that a function            
          or property relied upon for novelty is not possessed by prior art           
          compounds otherwise meeting the limitations of the claims.  In re           
          Best, 562 F.2d 1252, 1255, 195 USPQ 430, 433 (CCPA 1977).                   
               Here, each of claims 1, 14, and 27 recite that the first               
          cover layer comprises a majority portion by weight of a                     
          composition selected from the group consisting of polyurethane,             
          polyureas and blends thereof.  Claim 1 additionally requires that           
          the second outermost layer comprises a majority proportion by               
          weight of a polyurethane.  Claim  27 requires that the second               
          outermost cover layer comprises a majority proportion by weight             
          of a composition selected from the group consisting of                      
          polyurethane, polyureas and blends thereof.  Hence, the claims do           
          not differ from Wu’s disclosed polyurethane composition.  Thus,             
          it is appellants’ burden to show that the property of Shore D               
          hardness of less than 60 is not possessed by Wu.  Id.  We need              
          not evaluate Wu’s examples or tables in making this                         
          determination.  In this context, we note that a reference is not            
          limited to its examples, but is available for all that it fairly            
          discloses and suggests.  See In re Widmer, 353 F.2d 752, 757,               
                                         -3-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007