The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 26 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JEFF PINK ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1246 Application No. 09/960,948 ____________ HEARD: July 15, 2004 ____________ Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-19, all the claims pending in the application. Upon further consideration, the examiner has withdrawn the rejection as to dependent claims 4, 7, 9, 11, 15 and 18, and indicated that these claims would be allowable if rewritten in independent form to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claim (answer, page 2). Accordingly, thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007