Ex Parte Pink - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                            Paper No. 26              

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                  Ex parte JEFF PINK                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2004-1246                                 
                              Application No. 09/960,948                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                 HEARD: July 15, 2004                                 
                                     ____________                                     
          Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final              
          rejection of claims 1-19, all the claims pending in the                     
          application.  Upon further consideration, the examiner has                  
          withdrawn the rejection as to dependent claims 4, 7, 9, 11, 15 and          
          18, and indicated that these claims would be allowable if rewritten         
          in independent form to include all of the limitations of the base           
          claim and any intervening claim (answer, page 2).  Accordingly, the         







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007