Appeal No. 2004-1293 Application No. 09/989,330 as peat, organic polymers, and fibrous materials. (Column 1, line 5 to column 3, line 51; Examples 1-34.) Thus, we determine that one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it prima facie obvious to use substrates including organic material such as peat, organic polymers, and fibrous materials (e.g., fiberglas batting) as suggested by Cohen in James in order to enhance the growth of the live plants in an aquarium. Time for taking action This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b). 37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides that “[a] new ground of rejection shall not be considered final for the purposes of judicial review.” 37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise ONE (1) of the following two options with respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37 CFR § 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims: (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating to the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the application will be remanded to the examiner... (2) Request that the application be reheard under 37 CFR § 1.197(b) by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences upon the same record... 15Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007