Page 6
Appeal No. 2004-1298
Application No. 09/875,074
matter recited in parent claims 1 and 7, we also shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 3 through 6 and 9 through 12 as being
unpatentable over Coulton ‘521 in view of Brodeur and Rothberg or the standing 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 13 through 19 as being unpatentable
over Coulton ‘521 in view of Brodeur and the admitted prior art.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 22 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
)
JOHN P. McQUADE ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge )
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JPM/jlb
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007