Ex Parte McLoone et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                            Paper No. 21              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                  Ex parte HUGH E. MCLOONE and JAMES H. CAUTHORN                      
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2004-1307                                  
                             Application No. 09/843,724                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       
          Before KRASS, OWENS, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 3, 6,             
          7, 13-15, 17-22 and 24-30.  As of the final rejection claims 2,             
          4, 5, 8-12, 16 and 23 were canceled, and after the final                    
          rejection claims 22 and 24-26 were canceled.  Thus, the claims              
          before us are claims 1, 3, 6, 7, 13-15, 17-21 and 27-30.                    
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a keyboard which, the appellants state,           
          is for entering data into text and office systems such as                   
          computers (specification, page 1, lines 14-15).  Claims 1, 7,               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007