The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte KIMMO DJUPSJOBACKA, PEKKA OLLIKAINEN, JUKKA HAUTANEN, ESA EROLA, ERKKI TANSKANEN, LLARI SAARIKIVI, ARI AARNIO, KLAUS OESCH, RIITTA JOKELA, and TAPIO HAMEEN-ANTTILA _____________ Appeal No. 2004-1309 Application No. 09/410,978 ______________ HEARD: November 17, 2004 _______________ Before: KRASS, DIXON, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of claims 1 through 43, which constitute all the claims in the application.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007