Ex Parte Hocker et al - Page 12




              Appeal No. 2004-1321                                                               Page 12                 
              Application No. 10/002,633                                                                                 


                                                    CONCLUSION                                                           
                     To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 5 and 6 under 35                     
              U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Cermak is affirmed; the decision of the                            
              examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 5 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                        
              over Cermak in view of Ashiwake is reversed; and the decision of the examiner to reject                    
              claims 1, 2, 5 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Livingood in                         
              view of Wettstein is reversed.                                                                             






























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007