Appeal No. 2004-1321 Page 12 Application No. 10/002,633 CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 5 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Cermak is affirmed; the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 5 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cermak in view of Ashiwake is reversed; and the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 5 and 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Livingood in view of Wettstein is reversed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007