Appeal No. 2004-1380
Application No. 09/513,425
2. Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Kampe and Shearer in view of
Tsai.
3. Claims 4 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over the teachings of Kampe and Shearer in
view of Mecklermedia.
4. Claims 5, 6, 9, 10, 13 and 14 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the teachings of
Kampe and Nouri.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal,
the rejections advanced by the examiner and the evidence of
obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support for the
rejections. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants’
arguments set forth in the briefs along with the examiner’s
rationale in support of the rejections and arguments in rebuttal
set forth in the examiner’s answer.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007