Appeal No. 2004-1380
Application No. 09/513,425
physically located at the client’s computer, they are still
associated with a headless server system as the displays display
information with respect to the headless server system.
Therefore, we agree with the examiner that the collective
teachings of Kampe and Nouri render the invention of these claims
obvious within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103.
In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s rejections with
respect to claims 1-4, 7, 8, 11, 12 and 15-19, but we have not
sustained the rejection with respect to claims 5, 6, 9, 10, 13
and 14. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims
1-19 is affirmed-in-part.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007