Ex Parte Marmon et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-1583                                                         
          Application No. 09/760,962                                                   

               The subject matter on appeal relates to a process for                   
          preparing a nonwoven fabric.  Further details of this appealed               
          subject matter are recited in representative claim 28 reproduced             
          from the May 8, 2003 amendment below:                                        
                    28.  A process of preparing a nonwoven fabric,                     
               comprising:                                                             
                    forming a substrate of continuous multicomponent                   
               fibers, said, continuous multicomponent fibers                          
               comprising a plurality of individual components having                  
               a portion exposed at an outer surface of the                            
               continuous multicomponent fiber;                                        
                    pattern bonding from about 5% to about 50% of the                  
               surface area of the substrate of continuous                             
               multicomponent fibers to form a bonded substrate; and                   
               thereafter                                                              
                    entangling the bonded substrate wherein portions                   
               of the individual components become separated from                      
               said multicomponent fibers and further wherein said                     
               multicomponent fibers and said components separated                     
               therefrom become entangled to form an integrated                        
               nonwoven web.                                                           
               The examiner relies on the following prior art references               
          as evidence of unpatentability:                                              
          Haid et al.             5,240,764            Aug. 31, 1993                  
               (Haid)                                                                  
          Baravian                5,355,565            Oct. 18, 1994                  


                                                                                      
          8), proposing the cancellation of claims 30 and 31 and changes               
          to claims 28, 29, 32, 33, 41, 42, and 45.  The examiner                      
          indicated in the interview summary mailed Jun. 4, 2003 (paper                
          10) that the amendment will be entered for purposes of this                  
          appeal.                                                                      


                                          2                                            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007