Appeal No. 2004-1583
Application No. 09/760,962
We do not have to discuss Baravian and Pike ’400 because
they are unnecessary to support the examiner’s rejection of
appealed claim 28.
Summary
In summary, we affirm the examiner’s rejections under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) of appealed claims 28, 29, and 32 through 45 as
unpatentable over: (i) the combined teachings of Baravian, Pike
’400, Haid, JP ’936, and Pike ’926; and (ii) the combined
teachings of Pike ’926, Baravian, and Pike ’400.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007