The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YUEN-YIN L. KOO, ESHWAR PITTAMPALLI and DAVID ALBERT ROSSETTI ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1613 Application No. 09/686,0241 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, LEVY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3, 7, 9 and 10, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We reverse. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention is directed to mobile communications and to addressing the possibility of incompatibility between wireless base stations and mobile stations. 1 Application for patent filed October 11, 2000.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007