The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ROLAND R. THOMPSON and MICHAEL S. BLACKSTONE __________ Appeal No. 2004-1637 Application No. 09/130,807 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Roland R. Thompson et al. appeal from the final rejection (Paper No. 14) of claims 2, 3 and 8 through 22, all of the claims pending in the application. THE INVENTION The invention relates to a system for conveying advertising information to spectators. Representative claims 15 and 17 read as follows:1 1 The language in independent claims 15, 17, 19 and 21 defining the relationships between respective flexible members, motor driven reels and equipment support members is somewhat imprecise and should be clarified in the event of furtherPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007