Appeal No. 2004-1637
Application No. 09/130,807
camera mount being connected to said equipment support members;
control electronics that control at least one angular orientation
of said three-dimensionally moveable camera assembly; and a
plurality of light emitting objects coupled to the control
electronics, said plurality of light emitting objects conveying
advertising information to spectators in a field of view of said
three-dimensionally moveable camera assembly.
THE PRIOR ART
The references relied on by the examiner to support the
final rejection are:
Takubo 4,625,243 Nov. 25, 1986
Brown 4,710,819 Dec. 1, 1987
Penston, III (Penston) 5,531,453 Jul. 2, 1996
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 2, 3, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 19 and 20 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Brown in view
of Takubo.
Claims 9, 12 through 14, 17, 18, 21 and 22 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Brown in view
of Takubo and Penston.
Attention is directed to the brief (Paper No. 21) and answer
(Paper No. 23) for the respective positions of the appellants and
examiner regarding the merits of these rejections.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007