Ex Parte Sakumoto et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written 
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                                  Paper No. 17         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                      ____________                                     
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                      ____________                                     
          Ex parte KAZUMI SAKUMOTO, HIROSHI ODAGIRI, SUSUMU FUJITA, MASAFUMI           
                                HOSHINO and TOUYA AKASE                                
                                      ____________                                     
                                  Appeal No. 2004-1675                                 
                               Application No. 09/638,214                              
                                      ____________                                     
                                        ON BRIEF                                       
                                      ____________                                     
          Before GARRIS, PAK, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                            
                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the          
          examiner’s refusal to allow claims 16 through 39, which are all of           
          the claims pending in the above-identified application.                      
                                APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER                                
               The subject matter on appeal is directed to a self-luminous             
          display element driving device.  See the Specification, page 1.              
          Further details of the appealed subject matter are recited in                
          claims 16, 24 and 32 reproduced below:                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007