The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KAZUMI SAKUMOTO, HIROSHI ODAGIRI, SUSUMU FUJITA, MASAFUMI HOSHINO and TOUYA AKASE ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1675 Application No. 09/638,214 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, PAK, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 16 through 39, which are all of the claims pending in the above-identified application. APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER The subject matter on appeal is directed to a self-luminous display element driving device. See the Specification, page 1. Further details of the appealed subject matter are recited in claims 16, 24 and 32 reproduced below:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007