Ex Parte Sakumoto et al - Page 9



          Appeal No. 2004-1675                                                         
          Application No. 09/638,214                                                   

                                       CONCLUSION                                      
               In summary, we reverse the examiner’s decision rejecting the            
          claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(e) and 103 and remand the            
          application to the examiner to take appropriate action consistent            
          with the instruction provided above.                                         
               This application, by virtue of its “special” status, requires           
          immediate action, see MPEP & 708.01 (8th ed. Aug. 2001), item (D).           
          It is important that the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences           
          be promptly informed of any action affecting the appeal in this              
          case.                                                                        
               This remand to the examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 41.50(a)(1)            
          (effective September 13, 2004, 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12,                
          2004), 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (September 7, 2004) is not              
          made for further consideration of a rejection.  Accordingly, 37 CFR          
          § 41.50 (a)(2) does not apply.                                               









                                          9                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007