Appeal No. 2004-1681
Application No. 09/749,216
IV. The 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claim 25
Claim 25 depends upon claim 23. Hence, we reverse the
rejection of claim 25 also.
V. Conclusion
We affirm the anticipation rejection of claims 1-8 and
22, but reverse the anticipation rejection of claims 10-13
and 17-20.
We reverse 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 9, 14-16,
and 21 as being obvious over Schwalm in view of Comerci.
We reverse the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 23
and 24 as being obvious over Schwalm in view of Becker.
We reverse the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claim 25
under as being obvious over Schwalm in view of Becker and
Comerci.
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007