Ex Parte Pelto - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-1747                                                        
          Application No. 09/932,723                                                  


               an impermeable inner layer made from a second impermeable              
                    material, said impermeable outer layer, middle layer,             
                    and impermeable inner layer forming an exterior wall              
                    defining an internal cavity; and                                  
               a valve penetrating said exterior wall in communication                
                    between the exterior of said exterior wall and said               
                    internal cavity.                                                  
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Lucas                      3,667,625                June  6, 1972           
          Baxter                     3,939,995                Feb. 24, 1976           
          Leidig                     5,195,650                Mar. 23, 1993           
               Appellant's claimed invention is directed to an inflatable             
          bladder that is used in package transport.  The bladder comprises           
          inner and outer impermeable layers and a middle layer formed from           
          a puncture resistant material.                                              
               Appealed claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as           
          being unpatentable over Baxter in view of Leidig.  Claims 4-6               
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable               
          over the stated combination of references in further view of                
          Lucas.                                                                      
               Appellant does not present separate arguments for any                  
          particular claim on appeal.  Rather than advancing a substantive            
          argument with respect to the rejection of claims 3 and 4,                   
          appellant solicits the entry of amendments after final rejection            

                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007