Ex Parte Perbost - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          


                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                     __________                                                        
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                     __________                                                        
                                         Ex parte MICHEL G. M. PERBOST                                                 
                                                     __________                                                        
                                               Appeal No. 2004-1770                                                    
                                             Application No. 09/895,050                                                
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                     __________                                                        
              Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, FLEMING and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
              GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                      
              rejection of claims 29, 30, 32, 34, and 35.  Claims 31 and 33 are also pending; the                      
              examiner has indicated that claim 31 is allowable and claim 33 would be allowable if                     
              amended to remove its dependence on a rejected claim.   Claim 29 is representative of                    
              the claims on appeal and reads as follows:                                                               
                     29.   An apparatus for fabricating an addressable array of biopolymers on a                       
              substrate according to a target pattern, comprising:                                                     
                     (a) a deposition system which can separately dispense onto a substrate, fluid                     
              compositions of different biomonomers each with a first linking group which must be                      
              activated for linking to a substrate bound moiety, and a fluid composition of a solid                    
              activator;                                                                                               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007