Appeal No. 2004-1794
Application No. 09/626,039 Page 9
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 7 and 8
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Fisher in
view of Singh and Shoop; to reject claims 1 and 7 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Jay in view of Shoop; to
reject claim 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Jay in view of Shoop and Fisher; and to reject claims 18, 19
and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Jay in
view of Shoop is reversed.
REVERSED
PETER F. KRATZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CATHERINE TIMM ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ROMULO H. DELMENDO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
PFK/sld
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007