Ex Parte FITCHETT - Page 4


             Appeal No. 2004-1935                                                               Page 4                
             Application No. 09/308,403                                                                               

                                                     Discussion                                                       
                    According to Appellant, the claims stand or fall in two groups.  See the Appeal                   
             Brief, pages 5-6.  We will consider claims 1 and 17 as representative.                                   
                    Claim 1 is directed to a composition comprising a hemicellulosic material that                    
             contains arabinoxylan ferulate, an oxidase, and an oxidase substrate.  Claim 17 is                       
             directed to a method for effecting oxidative gelation of a hemicellulose-based                           
             composition; the method comprises promoting in situ generation of hydrogen peroxide                      
             by providing oxygen, water, or an oxidase substrate to the composition or activating a                   
             redox enzyme in the composition.                                                                         
                    The examiner rejected all of the claims as obvious in view of Greenshields and                    
             Crawford.  See the Examiner’s Answer, page 5:                                                            
                    Greenshields discloses the peroxidase-catalyzed oxidative gelling of                              
                    feruloylated arabinoxylans from various plant and cereal sources. . . .                           
                    See, e.g., Abstract; see also col. 5, lines 17-50.  Greenshields differs from                     
                    the claims in that Greenshields adds the peroxidase’s substrate,                                  
                    [hydrogen] peroxide, directly to the gelling composition, as opposed to                           
                    generating the peroxide in situ by adding glucose oxidase and glucose                             
                    [(an oxidase substrate)], as recited in appellant’s claims.                                       
                    However, Crawford clearly discloses that a combination of glucose and                             
                    glucose oxidase can be used effectively to generate in situ the peroxide                          
                    required for peroxidase action on a polysaccharide substrate.  See col. 6,                        
                    lines 32-43.  Thus, the artisan of ordinary skill at the time of appellant’s                      
                    invention clearly would have recognized that an effective method of                               
                    generating the peroxide required for peroxidase action in Greenshields’                           
                    process would have been the generation of the peroxide in situ by adding                          
                    glucose and glucose oxidase to the gelling composition, as disclosed in                           
                    Crawford.                                                                                         
                    We agree with the examiner that Greenshields and Crawford support a prima                         
             facie case of obviousness.  In Example 1, Greenshields discloses production of a gel                     
             from corn bran.  The corn bran was ground, treated with cytase enzyme, extracted with                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007