Ex Parte Karas et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2004-2019                                                        
          Application No. 10/301,441                                 Page 3           


               As for the § 102(b) rejection of claims 1 and 3 over                   
          Knifton, the so rejected claims require that an MTBE1 stream                
          comprised mainly (chiefly or for the most part)2 of MTBE and                
          containing a minor quantity of impurities is contacted in the               
          liquid phase with a solid large pore zeolite.  See Examples 1 and           
          2 of the present specification.  A product MTBE stream having a             
          reduced content of impurities is recovered.  As evident by a fair           
          reading of appellants’ specification, appellants employ the term            
          “impurities” to represent all components other than MTBE.  This             
          is made manifest by a review of the specification as a whole                
          including the Examples (see, e.g., Example 1) presented in the              
          specification.  While Knifton discloses contacting an MTBE stream           
          with a zeolite material to remove acids from the stream, the MTBE           
          streams disclosed in Knifton include mainly (a major amount of)             
          impurities including methanol (MeOH) and t-butanol (tBA) and a              



               1 methyl tertiary butyl ether.                                         
               2 See, e.g., the definition of “mainly” and “minor” at pages           
          734 and 775 of the American College Dictionary (1970).  A copy of           
          those pages of the dictionary is enclosed with the decision.  We            
          note that the definition relative to quantity applies in the                
          context of the claimed subject matter, not any alternative                  
          definitions that may be attributed to those terms.  In this                 
          regard, the terms “mainly” and “minor” are inextricably                     
          intertwined in the context of the claimed invention.                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007