Ex Parte OUTSLAY et al - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2004-2043                                                        
          Application 09/312,919                                                      

                    Grouping of claims. For each ground of                            
                    rejection which appellant contests and which                      
                    applies to a group of two or more claims, the                     
                    Board shall select a single claim from the                        
                    group and shall decide the appeal as to the                       
                    ground of rejection on the basis of that                          
                    claim alone unless a statement is included                        
                    that the claims of the group do not stand or                      
                    fall together and, in the argument under                          
                    paragraph (c)(8) of this section, appellant                       
                    explains why the claims of the group are                          
                    believed to be separately patentable. Merely                      
                    pointing out differences in what the claims                       
                    cover is not an argument as to why the claims                     
                    are separately patentable. (Emphasis added)                       
          Therefore, based on the applicability of Appellants’ arguments to           
          the rejected claims, we will consider Appellants’ claims, as                
          standing or falling together and we will treat claim 1 as the               
          representative claim of this group.  If the brief fails to meet             
          either requirement, the Board is free to select a single claim              
          from each group and to decide the appeal of that rejection based            
          solely on the selected representative claim.  In re McDaniel, 293           
          F.3d 1379, 1383, 63 USPQ2d 1462, 1465 (Fed. Cir. 2002).  See also           
          In re Watts, 354 F.3d 1362, 1367, 69 USPQ2d 1453, 1457 (Fed. Cir.           
          2004).                                                                      






                                          4                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007