Appeal No. 2004-2043
Application 09/312,919
No. 10) has not been properly entered. At the top of page 2 of
this amendment there is an instruction as to the placement of pages
2-15 of the amendment. This instruction line has been overlooked
and pages 2-15 of the amendment have been treated as part of the
insert found on page 1 of this amendment.
Conclusion
In view of the foregoing discussion, we have not sustained
the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1, 3-8, and 10-13.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
ALLEN R. MACDONALD )
Administrative Patent Judge )
ARD:pgc
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007