The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte Kwaku O. PRAKAH-ASANTE, MANOHARPRASAD K. RAO and GARY STEVEN STRUMOLO ____________ Appeal No. 2004-2269 Application No. 10/076,405 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 6, 11, 12 and 14 to 20.1 Claims 7 to 10 and 13, which are the only other claims pending in this application, have been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim. We REVERSE. 1 While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment after final rejection (filed December 12, 2003), we note that this amendment has not been clerically entered.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007