Ex Parte Moravec et al - Page 5



          Appeal No. 2004-2352                                                        
          Application No. 09/854,419                                                  

          involved a comparison between a single polyester urethane and a             
          single polyether urethane; whereas claim 1 is not limited to any            
          particular polyester urethane.                                              
               Moreover, all of appellants’ data relate to a single mixture           
          of two photochromic dyes (CR49 and CR59); whereas appellants’               
          claims are not limited to any particular photochromic compound or           
          mixture.  In this regard, we note that there are apparently a               
          wide variety of known photochromic compounds, both organic and              
          inorganic (Bhalakia: col. 7, ll. 52-67; instant specification:              
          page 3, ll. 1-4).                                                           
               Additionally, besides the fact that appellants’ data is                
          limited to the testing of just one polyester and one polyether              
          urethane, appellants have not identified the tested polymers in             
          terms of their chemical structure.  Thus, it cannot be determined           
          from the data presented whether the tested polyester and                    
          polyether urethane are comparable in terms of molecular weight,             
          functional group content, and extent of crosslinking.  Also, it             
          is not clear whether the tested polyester and polyether urethane            
          are comparable to those identified in Ormsby or Rosthauser.                 




                                          5                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007