Ex Parte Springhorn et al - Page 5



          Appeal No. 2005-0086                                                        
          Application No. 09/969,265                                                  

               While there may be a correlation between current and voltage           
          by Ohm’s Law, the fact remains that it is the voltage, not the              
          current, which is actually measured in Kato I.  The examiner has            
          not met the burden of explaining how Kato I can be taken as                 
          teaching that current, rather than voltage, be measured.                    
               We note that Kato II discloses use of an ammeter to measure            
          current as the basis for determining gas concentration (col. 13,            
          ll. 31-2; col. 16, ll. 6-9; Fig. 2).  However, since the issue              
          before us is one of anticipation, we find no need to consider any           
          issue of obviousness with regard to claims 1-10 and 12-16.                  
               The rejection of claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 also is                
          reversed since Joshi fails to remedy the deficiency of the                  
          primary reference, Kato I, which has been discussed, supra.                 












                                          5                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007