The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ERIK HEINEMANN,
FRANK PUSCHNER and
DETLEF HOUDEAU
_____________
Appeal No. 2005-0088
Application No. 10/160,629
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-7.
Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A smart-card module, comprising:
a substrate film formed of an anisotropically
conductive material and having a surface;
at least one semiconductor chip having connection
points and disposed on said substrate film; and
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007