Ex Parte Choi et al - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   




                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                  
              Ex parte JAE HONG CHOI, JERALD L. GOLMANAVICH and BARRY B. HOFMASTER                             
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal No. 2005-0169                                              
                                           Application No. 10/118,754                                          
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                    
                                                 ____________                                                  
             Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
             BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4 and          
             14-17, which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                   
                   We AFFIRM.                                                                                  
                                               BACKGROUND                                                      
                   The appellants’ invention relates to a multiple cavity injection molding system and         
             a method for promoting uniform filling of said mold cavities using such injection molding         








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007