Ex Parte Preisler - Page 5



          Appeal No. 2005-0361                                                        
          Application 10/252,177                                                      

          II. New rejection                                                           

               The following new rejection is entered pursuant to 37 CFR              
          § 41.50(b).                                                                 

               Claims 18 through 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,               
          second paragraph, as failing to particularly point out and                  
          distinctly claim the subject matter the appellant regards as the            
          invention.                                                                  

               The second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 requires claims to             
          set out and circumscribe a particular area with a reasonable                
          degree of precision and particularity.  In re Johnson, 558 F.2d             
          1008, 1015, 194 USPQ 187, 193 (CCPA 1977).  In determining                  
          whether this standard is met, the definiteness of the language              
          employed in the claims must be analyzed, not in a vacuum, but               
          always in light of the teachings of the prior art and of the                
          particular application disclosure as it would be interpreted by             
          one possessing the ordinary level of skill in the pertinent art.            
          Id.                                                                         



                                          5                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007