Appeal No. 2005-0361 Application 10/252,177 The specification in the instant application describes the appellant’s unitary composite air bag cover (10, 110) as comprising (1) a one-piece thermoplastic elastomeric body (16, 118) including a front panel (20, 122), and (2) a one-piece thermoplastic outer layer (30, 132) bonded to the front panel of the one-piece thermoplastic elastomeric body by diffusion. Appealed claims 18 through 24, however, recite methods of making a unitary composite air bag wherein the body and the front panel are set forth as separate pieces. For example, independent claims 18, 23 and 24 define the body as having “a contact surface layer that contacts substantially an entire bottom contact surface of a front panel of the cover,” and further recite a molecular concentration gradient “formed at an interface between the first and second plastics comprising the body contact surface layer and the front panel bottom contact surface.” In addition, claim 24 ambiguously refers to “an outer layer of the air bag cover” without any indication as to how this outer layer relates to the body and front panel. In the same vein, dependent claims 19 and 20 contradict parent claim 18 by respectively reciting that the second plastic forms a “one-piece outer layer” and that the body “includes the front panel.” Finally, the term “the 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007