Interference No. 104,829 Paper92
Vigne/Gencell v. Kovesdi v. Perricaudet/Gencell Page 2
"Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.662(a), the party Kovesdi hereby abandons the
contest as to current Counts 1-6 as set forth in the 'Order Redeclaring Interference'
dated September 16, 2003" (Paper 91, p . 2). Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Counts 1-6 (Paper 79, pp. 2-4) is
awarded against junior party IMRE KOVESDI, DOUGLAS E. BROUGH, DUNCAN L.
McVEY, JOSEPH T. BRUDER and ALENA LIZONOVA.
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party IMRE KOVESDI, DOUGLAS E.
BROUGH, DUNCAN L. McVEY, JOSEPH T. BRUDER and ALENA LIZONOVA is not
entitled to a patent containing
(i) claims 20-21, 24-26, 52, 56-58, 68-69, 72-73, 78-79 and 84-87
(corresponding to Count 1),
(ii) claims 19, 36, 41-42, 89-90 and 95 (corresponding to Count 2),
(iii) claims 20-21, 24-26, 52-56, 68-71, 78-79, 82 and 84-87 (corresponding to
Count 3),
(iv) claims 19, 36-40, 89-90 and 92-95 (corresponding to Count 4),
(v) claims 20-21, 24-26, 52-87 (corresponding to Count 5), and
(vi) claims 19, 36-41, 43-51, 89-90 and 92-95 (corresponding to Count 6)
of application 08/258,416, filed June 10, 1994.1
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in the
files of U.S. patent 6,127,175, U.S. application 08/258,416 and U.S. application
I Kovesdi claims 22-23 and 91 do not correspond to any of Counts I through 6 and, therefore, are
not involved in the interference (Paper 79, p. 4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007