Interference No. 104,833
Page No. 19
reissue application (Paper 114 at 29-34). Accordingly, we dismiss as moot Bries preliminary
motions 3 and 4, Hazes preliminary motions 4, 6 and 8, and that portion of Hazes preliminary
motion 5 seeking to add count 4. For the purpose of entering judgment against Hazes reissue
application claims 1-15, those claims are designated as corresponding to count 3.
Motions to sapress
Both Hazes and Bries filed motions to suppress certain evidence (Papers 90 and 95).
During oral argument, counsel for 3M withdrew from consideration both motions to suppress
(Paper 114 at 8). Accordingly, Bries motion to suppress and Hazes motion to suppress are
dismissed.
D. Redeclaration of Interference
This interference is herein re-declared to the following extent:
1. Hazes reissue application 10/192,1466, filed 10 July 2002 is added to the interference.
2. Original counts I and 2 are substituted with count 3.
3. Count 3 is:
Bries claim 82
or
Bries claim 83
4. The parties' claims corresponding to count 3 are:
Hazes 6,086,973 patent: 1-13
6 Hazes reissue application has been assigned to 3M. According to PTO records, the
assignment was executed on 12 June 2003 and recorded on I I July 2003.
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007