Interference No. 105,019 Correa v. Roberts The next feature in claim 20 is "a liquid pervious topsheet overlying said body-facing side of said absorbent core." According to Correa's preliminary motion Fact ý 44, Lawson '278 discloses a liquid pervious topsheet 38 which overlies the side of the absorbent contacting the body of the wearer. Roberts does not dispute these alleged facts. Based on Correa's Fact 144 and parts of Lawson '278 cited in that paragraph, we find that Lawson '278 further discloses a liquid pervious topsheet overlying said body-facing side of said absorbent core. The next feature in claim 20 is "at least one flap, each said flap being comprised of continuous extensions of said topsheet and said backsheet." According to Correa's preliminary motion Fact 145, Lawson '278 discloses two flaps formed from continuous extensions of the backsheet and the topsheet. Roberts does not dispute these alleged facts. Based on Correa's Fact 145 and parts of Lawson '278 cited in that paragraph, we find that Lawson '278 further discloses at least one flap, each said flap being comprised of continuous extensions of said topsheet and said backsheet. The next feature in claim 20 is "a pair of barrier elements comprising a layer of absorbent material overlying said topsheet and joined thereto along said longitudinal edges, wherein, when the sanitary napkin assumes a shape when worn, said barrier elements stand up to form channels for containing body fluid." According to Correa's preliminary motion Fact I 46(b), citing to various parts of the Lawson '278 reference, Lawson '278 discloses a pair of barrier elements comprising a layer of absorbent material overlying said topsheet and joined thereto along said longitudinal edges. While Roberts denies Correa's Fact I 46(b), we are unpersuaded by the arguments contained in Robert's opposition as to why the portions of Lawson '278 cited in - 8 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007